On this page
Step 1 — the sandbox's running servicesStep 2 — checking theserver image after the fixWhat to take awayWalkthrough (sandbox evidence)
This PR has no UI screens — it edits one line of a package.json. So instead of clicking through screens, this walkthrough drives the sandbox terminal for the perf/sandbox-image-slim branch (the branch this PR ships on) to show what actually happens when the change is built and run.
Step 1 — the sandbox's running services
Opening the sandbox terminal shows the containers this branch's preview environment actually runs:

Note what's not there: no auth-api container, and no whatsapp container (this sandbox has WhatsApp disabled — whatsapp=false in its settings). That matches the Dockerfile's own header comment that the auth-server target doesn't exist on this branch. The PR description's mention of an "auth-api" image doesn't correspond to anything this Dockerfile builds today.
Step 2 — checking the server image after the fix
The sandbox was built from this PR's own head commit, so its server container already reflects the dependencies → devDependencies move. Opening a shell in the server container and checking both the manifest and the actual installed files:

Reading this top to bottom:
dependencies.prisma = undefined— confirms the PR's edit landed:
prisma is no longer under dependencies in the running image's copy of packages/server/package.json.
devDependencies.prisma = 7.4.2— confirms it now lives in
devDependencies instead, at the same pinned version as before.
/app/node_modules/.bin/prismastill exists as a symlink into
../prisma/build/index.js, and /app/node_modules/prisma is still 41 MB on disk.
In other words: the manifest changed exactly as the PR intends, but the server image that's actually running in this sandbox did not get smaller. That's expected once you read Dockerfile:303-308 (see Feature breakdown) — the server image build step never passes --production, so it installs devDependencies right alongside dependencies regardless of which section a package sits in.
What to take away
This isn't a bug in the terminal session or a stale image — it's the Dockerfile's build stage doing exactly what its own comment says it does. The evidence here is the honest, current-state answer to "did this PR shrink the server image?" for this repository as it stands today: no, not by itself. See Feature breakdown for where the change does matter, and For Quality for what a tester should check before treating the image-size goal as met.